Kentucky's Certificate of Need Program: Lessons from Research
James Bailey, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Economics, Providence College Senior Research Affiliate, Knee Regulatory Research Center at West Virginia University
Submitted: June 17, 2024
Distinguished committee members:
My name is James Bailey. As a health economist, I have spent much of the last decade studying Certificate of Need (CON) laws, and I appreciate the opportunity to share my findings with you. Please note that I am writing only on my own behalf, and do not intend to represent the views of my employer.
CON laws require health providers to obtain the permission of a state board before opening, expanding, or offering a new type of service. Most states passed their CON law in response to a 1974 federal mandate1, though 15 states have repealed their laws since the federal requirement was dropped in the 1980’s. Kentucky’s Certificate of Need program aims to prevent “the proliferation of health care facilities, health services and major medical equipment that increase the cost of quality health care in the commonwealth.”2 Academic research on CON, however, shows that if anything CON has led to higher costs, and both research and common sense suggest that preventing the proliferation of health care facilities and services reduces access to care.
State Symbols USA. "Seal of Kentucky." State Symbols USA, https://statesymbolsusa.org/symbol-official-item/kentucky/state-seal/seal-kentucky
...we found that most research found that CON led to higher spending and worse access to care.CON Decreases Access to Care and Increases Health Care Costs
With Dr. Christopher Conover of Duke University, I conducted a systematic review of the academic literature on CON laws3. Surveying the articles that provided original empirical estimates, we found that most research found that CON led to higher spending and worse access to care. The most straightforward and direct effect of CON is that these laws make it more expensive, time-consuming, and difficult to open or expand a health care facility and to acquire health care equipment. The academic literature confirms that this generally results in fewer facilities and less equipment in CON states. CON is associated with:
- 13 percent fewer hospital beds4
- 26 percent fewer hospitals offering MRI scans and CT scans5
- 30 percent fewer hospitals per capita6
- 14 percent fewer ambulatory surgery centers7
- 49 percent fewer neonatal intensive care beds8
Kentucky's CON Program
By one recent measure, Kentucky currently operates one of the most restrictive CON programs in the country. The Institute for Justice measured the number of different types of health facilities, equipment, and services regulated by CON laws in every state, noting that Kentucky is one of only 7 states to regulate all 6 out a possible 6 broad categories.
Works Cited
1 The National Health Planning and Resource Development Act of 1974. See Conover and Bailey (2020) for a more detailed history: https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-020-05563-1
2 From: https://www.chfs.ky.gov/agencies/os/oig/dcn/Pages/cn.aspx
3 Conover, C.J., Bailey, J. Certificate of need laws: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 20, 748 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05563-1
4 Stratmann T, Russ J. Do Certificate-of-Need Laws Increase Indigent Care?. Mercatus Center working paper https://www.mercatus.org/system/files/Stratmann-Certificate-Need.pdf
5 Stratmann T, Russ J. Do Certificate-of-Need Laws Increase Indigent Care?. Mercatus Center working paper https://www.mercatus.org/system/files/Stratmann-Certificate-Need.pdf
6 Stratmann T, Koopman C. Entry Regulation and Rural Health Care: Certificate-of-Need Laws, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, and Community Hospitals. Mercatus Center working paper https://www.mercatus.org/publications/regulation/entry-regulation-and-rural-health-care-certificate-need-laws-ambulatory (an older article finds a 48 percent decrease- see Eichmann TL, Santerre RE. Do hospital chief executive officers extract rents from Certificate of Need laws?. Journal of health care finance. 2011;37(4):1-4.)
7 Stratmann T, Koopman C. Entry Regulation and Rural Health Care: Certificate-of-Need Laws, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, and Community Hospitals. Mercatus Center working paper https://www.mercatus.org/publications/regulation/entry-regulation-and-rural-health-care-certificate-need-laws-ambulatory
8 Lorch SA, Maheshwari P, Even-Shoshan O. The impact of certificate of need programs on neonatal intensive care units. Journal of Perinatology. 2012 Jan;32(1):39-44.
9 Bailey J. Can health spending be reined in through supply restraints? An evaluation of certificate-of-need laws. Journal of Public Health. 2019 Dec 1;27(6):755-60.
10 Bailey J, Hamami T. Competition and Health-Care Spending: Theory and Application to Certificate of Need Laws. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia working paper 19-38 https://www.philadelphiafed.org/the-economy/competition-and-health-care-spending-theory-and-application-to-certificate-of-need-laws
11 Bailey J, Hamami T, McCorry D. Certificate of need laws and health care prices. Journal of Health Care Finance. 2016 Jul 17;43(4).
12 https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/1579079/summer_2020_wilson_deregulating_health_care_in_a_pandemic-_and_beyond.pdf
13 Choudhury, Agnitra Roy, Sriparna Ghosh, and Alicia Plemmons. 2022. "Certificate of Need Laws and Health Care Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic" Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15, no. 2: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020076